🎉 [Gate 30 Million Milestone] Share Your Gate Moment & Win Exclusive Gifts!
Gate has surpassed 30M users worldwide — not just a number, but a journey we've built together.
Remember the thrill of opening your first account, or the Gate merch that’s been part of your daily life?
📸 Join the #MyGateMoment# campaign!
Share your story on Gate Square, and embrace the next 30 million together!
✅ How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post a photo or video with Gate elements
2️⃣ Add #MyGateMoment# and share your story, wishes, or thoughts
3️⃣ Share your post on Twitter (X) — top 10 views will get extra rewards!
👉
IOTA Cofounder Calls for XRP Collaboration, Highlights Key Differences - Crypto News Flash
Dominik Schiener, co-founder of IOTA, has responded positively to a public comparison between IOTA Rebased and XRP, suggesting future cooperation could benefit both sides. The comment came after X user Cigamatoi posted a detailed comparison, highlighting the different directions taken by these two decade-old blockchain networks.
Schiener stated, “Really nice comparison of IOTA and XRP!” He emphasized that both are “OG projects” with over ten years in development. He described XRP as a US-based network expanding into Europe, while IOTA, rooted in Europe, is now entering the US market.
“Lots of great lessons from the XRP community and would love to see more collaborations with them,” Schiener added.
Cigamatoi drew a line between the networks’ visions. XRP was built primarily to speed up cross-border payments. In contrast, IOTA aims to handle real-world assets, decentralized applications, and digital identity, creating broader infrastructure beyond finance.
Decentralization, Speed, and Governance Show a Clear Split
Consensus mechanisms show philosophical divergence. XRP uses a federated approach with validators that are often tied to Ripple. IOTA’s permissionless DPoS approach offers a decentralized model with open access. According to Cigamatoi, that means IOTA is founded more on trustless consensus, but XRP is based on pre-defined validators
Transaction speed shows a major technical distinction. XRP requires approximately 3 to 5 seconds per transaction, and under ideal conditions, can handle 1,500 to 4,000 transactions per second. Meanwhile, IOTA Rebased is designed for over 50,000 TPS and has already reached around 5,000 under internal tests. Finality is under one second.
Smart contract capabilities are also on different timelines. XRP is still developing “Hooks,” which have limited use cases. IOTA Rebased already has native-integrated, flexible smart contracts that can exhibit numerous use cases across industries.
IOTA is being applied across supply chains, IoT devices, tokenized physical assets, ESG reporting, and digital identity systems. XRP remains tied to its original goal: cross-border bank payments and liquidity handling. IOTA is targeting full industrial environments, not just finance-related transactions.
Transaction costs and token use also differ. XRP’s fee per transfer is extremely low, under 0.00001 XRP. IOTA Rebased averages around 0.0005 IOTA and allows users to avoid direct charges through sponsor arrangements. XRP does not include staking, and its token distribution was more top-heavy early on. IOTA has built-in staking and claims that its user base guides decisions.
The technical structure further separates the two. XRP follows a single-layer design—quick but rigid. IOTA’s framework uses separate modules, which allows adjustments and additions more easily over time.
Cigamatoi concluded that XRP fits the earlier stage of crypto due to its specific target and simplicity. But as interest grows in open governance, adaptability, and clearer mechanisms, platforms like IOTA may be a better fit for what comes next.
Recommended for you: